Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 26 Aug 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone * Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault David Banas, Xilinx * Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock * Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy Huang Chunxing, Huawei Technologies John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology * Pavani Jella, TI Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: - Mike rewrite 5.3.13-14 - Anders create example IBIS file with golden waveforms - Made a single ended model so far. - Want to compare to actual simulation results. - Will produce a spreadsheet file for posting. New items: IQ spec 1.1ag has significant changes and has not been posted AR: Mike post IQ spec 1.1ag to website Continued review of the IBIS Quality Specification: 5.3.13. {LEVEL 2} Clamp I-V behavior not double-counted - Anders: Sometimes clamp tabless contain current in the operating region - This is Pullup/Pulldown current, not on-die termination - Ran into this recently - Does IBISCHK check this? - Bob: Probably would report I/V-V/T mismatch - IBISCHK uses combined tables for this - We will revisit this check if IBISCHK does not detect operating region double counting AR: Anders make model to test if IBISCHK detects double-counted Pullup/Pulldown 5.3.14. {LEVEL 2} On-die termination modeling documented - Mike has added one sentence mentioning the use of [Add Submodel]. - We approved this check as written. 5.3.15. {LEVEL 2} ECL models I-V tables swept from -Vdd to +2 Vdd. - Mike: Is Vdd well defined for ECL? - Bob: IBIS specifies -2V to Vdd. - For IBIS ECL Vdd is the non-negative voltage. - Bob: IBIS defect, no need to define [PullDown Reference] - Only [GND Clamp] needs it. - If ECL operates with -2V and 5.2V: - [Voltage Range] would be 0 - [GND Clamp] would be -5.2 - This may apply to LVDS also. - We added clarification on what Vdd means for ECL. - We added clarification on departures from the IBIS spec. 5.3.16. {LEVEL 2} Point distributions in IV curves should be sufficient - Mike: Is "points of inflection" defined well enough? - Bob: Yes. - Pavani: In lab measurements current limits make it difficult to get 10 points - Often have a 10mA limit using analyzer. - Bob: Normally use 100mA limit. - Somtimes use 2 sweeps. - Bob: Don't need accurate modeling of the high currents - We build models for simulation, not for accurate modeling. - We approved this check as written. Pavani: Some drivers can't be disabled, can't separate clamp currents - This can happen with bench measurement. - Mike: Some models seem to have algorithmic separation by voltage range - Bob: Arpad's tool tends to produce this. - Some devices actually behave this way. Next meeting: 02 Sep 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:12 PM Eastern Time.